H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Christina Mchale vs Shuai Peng H2H: 3-1

Christina Mchale holds a 3–1 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Christina Mchale leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Christina Mchale won the 2013 Madrid second round 7-5 5-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2013* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Christina Mchale #55 7-5 5-7 6-1 Shuai Peng #35 Match data
Feb 16, 2012* Doha WTA 1000 R32 Hard Christina Mchale #38 5-7 6-3 6-2 Shuai Peng #16 Match data
Sep 29, 2011* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #15 6-0 6-3 Christina Mchale #51 Match data
May 11, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Christina Mchale #92 6-3 2-6 7-6(7) Shuai Peng #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christina Mchale Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2