H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Christina Mchale vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Indian Wells third round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2019* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #36 6-2 7-5 Christina Mchale #140 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Christina Mchale Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47