H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Christina Sandberg vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 2-0
Christina Sandberg holds a 2–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Christina Sandberg leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Christina Sandberg won the 1971 Bastad fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 78
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 77
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 1971* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Christina Sandberg | (w/o) | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
| Jun 23, 1971* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Christina Sandberg | 6-4 6-2 | Raquel Giscafre | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christina Sandberg | — | — | — | 1,838 | 130 | 90 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Raquel Giscafre | — | — | — | 1,797 | 86 | 120 | 41.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Christina Sandberg | Raquel Giscafre | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1968 | 22–15 | 59.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1969 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1970 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1971 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1972 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,725 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1973 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1974 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 4 |