H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Pam Casale H2H: 2-0
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1985 Dallas third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 1985* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 7-6 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1983* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 7-6 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |