H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Pam Shriver H2H: 3-6 (incl. walkovers)

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Pam Shriver: 2–6 excluding walkovers; 3–6 including 1 walkover. Across 9 main-draw results including walkovers, Pam Shriver leads 3–1 on grass and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-3 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudia Kohde Kilsch
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H including walkovers
3 – 6
9 main-draw results
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #35 6-3 5-7 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #69 Match data Feb 24, 1992 R32 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 Match data Oct 22, 1988* SF Zurich WTA 250 Carpet
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 6-2 6-1 Pam Shriver #3 Match data Jun 12, 1988* F Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 7-5 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data Jan 9, 1988* SF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 6-4 6-0 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data Jan 2, 1988* SF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver #4 Match data Jul 29, 1985* F Manhattan Beach Series Category 4 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver 6-1 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Nov 19, 1983* QF Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass
Pam Shriver 7-6 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data Feb 18, 1983* R16 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Claudia Kohde Kilsch (w/o) Pam Shriver Match data Feb 26, 1982* R16 Oakland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,158 401 234 63.1% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 1980 36–18 66.7% — 1,754 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1981 40–22 64.5% — 1,838 0 5 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1982 34–23 59.6% — 1,909 0 8 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1983 29–20 59.2% — 1,871 0 8 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,019 0 9 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,117 0 10 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,051 0 10 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 2,019 0 10 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1988 39–19 67.2% #12 1,944 0 11 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,852 0 11 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,791 0 12 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,681 0 12 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,646 0 12 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 — — — — — — — 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 — — — — — — — 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 — — — — — — — 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 — — — — — — — 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 1980 — — — — 23 11 34 67.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1982 8 3 11 72.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 9 19 52.6% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1984 11 4 15 73.3% 15 3 18 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1985 16 4 20 80.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1986 5 3 8 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1991 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1992 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79 44 123 64.2% 137 74 211 64.9% 94 47 141 66.7% 84 69 153 54.9% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1977 1485 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1979 1481 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 1980 1754 141.9 — — — — -177 +14 -96 63.0% +1.28 11–8 (58%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +2.19 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1981 1839 144.2 — — — — -30 +101 -183 61.9% +0.82 9–6 (60%) 8–4 (67%) 108.3 +1.97 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1982 1909 149.0 — — — — -39 -95 -105 56.3% +0.45 10–6 (63%) 9–5 (64%) 105.4 -3.56 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1983 1871 146.4 — — — — -37 -5 +26 57.3% +0.57 9–5 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 100.9 -2.04 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1984 2020 157.9 — — — — -105 +10 -19 68.9% +1.35 11–7 (61%) 7–2 (78%) 106.9 -0.85 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1985 2117 168.7 — — — — -41 -27 -48 67.3% +1.34 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 101.3 -5.33 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1986 2051 166.8 — — — — +5 +61 +33 69.2% +1.38 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 94.1 -3.82 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1987 2019 157.7 — — — — +25 +60 +93 66.1% +1.25 7–2 (78%) 6–4 (60%) 105.5 -4.06 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1988 1944 157.8 — — — — +22 +69 +216 66.7% +1.34 6–6 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 95.8 -2.14 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1989 1852 145.0 — — — — +53 — +235 50.7% +0.23 8–3 (73%) 0–6 (0%) 94.9 -0.60 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1990 1791 135.8 — — — — +1 +129 +296 50.6% +0.34 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 -1.35 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1991 1681 120.9 — — — — +20 +142 +305 46.8% -0.32 3–8 (27%) 6–2 (75%) 93.8 +0.54 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1992 1646 122.3 — — — — +44 +113 +331 42.9% -0.62 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.52 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 2158 157.5 — — — — -16 +44 +48 60.8% +0.85 99–69 (59%) 57–57 (50%) 100.8 -3.09 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.