H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Pam Shriver H2H: 3-6

Pam Shriver holds a 6–3 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 3–1 on grass and 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Indian Wells third round 6-3 5-7 6-3.

Age 62 Right-Handed 187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 27, 1992* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Pam Shriver #35 6-3 5-7 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #69 Match data
Oct 22, 1988* Zurich WTA 250 SF Carpet Pam Shriver #5 6-4 6-4 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 Match data
Jun 12, 1988* Birmingham WTA 250 F Grass Claudia Kohde Kilsch #11 6-2 6-1 Pam Shriver #3 Match data
Jan 9, 1988* Sydney WTA 500 SF Grass Pam Shriver #4 7-5 6-2 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data
Jan 2, 1988* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Grass Pam Shriver #4 6-4 6-0 Claudia Kohde Kilsch #10 Match data
Jul 29, 1985* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 F Hard Claudia Kohde Kilsch #8 6-2 6-4 Pam Shriver #4 Match data
Nov 19, 1983* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Grass Pam Shriver 6-1 6-1 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
Feb 18, 1983* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver 7-6 6-3 Claudia Kohde Kilsch Match data
Feb 26, 1982* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Claudia Kohde Kilsch (w/o) Pam Shriver Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Claudia Kohde Kilsch #387 #4 77 2,157 401 233 63.2% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Kohde Kilsch Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% 1,849 0 1
16 1980 36–18 66.7% 1,755 0 1 1979 16–16 50.0% 1,798 0 1
17 1981 40–22 64.5% 1,841 0 5 1980 47–21 69.1% 2,027 0 2
18 1982 34–23 59.6% 1,914 0 8 1981 58–25 69.9% 2,122 0 4
19 1983 29–20 59.2% 1,871 0 8 1982 47–19 71.2% 2,087 0 5
20 1984 42–16 72.4% #8 2,014 0 9 1983 52–15 77.6% 2,161 0 8
21 1985 49–19 72.1% #5 2,115 0 10 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1986 39–17 69.6% #7 2,049 0 10 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1987 35–16 68.6% #10 1,994 0 10 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1988 39–18 68.4% #12 1,952 0 11 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1989 16–13 55.2% #37 1,856 0 11 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1990 17–16 51.5% #46 1,792 0 12 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1991 14–19 42.4% #85 1,682 0 12 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1992 11–14 44.0% #78 1,647 0 12 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24