H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-1
Claudia Kohde Kilsch and Patricia Medrado are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 1–0 on carpet, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1985 Roland Garros second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-4 6-4 | Patricia Medrado | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1982* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Patricia Medrado | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |