H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Kohde Kilsch vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 2-0
Claudia Kohde Kilsch holds a 2–0 lead over Yvonne Vermaak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Wimbledon third round 4-6 6-0 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 4-6 6-0 9-7 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1981* | Boise | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-2 6-4 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |