H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudia Monteiro vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 1-1
Claudia Monteiro and Debbie Spence Nasim are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Monteiro leads 1–0 on grass, while Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Debbie Spence Nasim won the 1986 Tulsa third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1986* | Tulsa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Debbie Spence Nasim | 6-1 6-2 | Claudia Monteiro | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1986* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Claudia Monteiro | 6-4 6-1 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Monteiro | — | — | — | 1,620 | 51 | 95 | 34.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Debbie Spence Nasim | — | — | — | 1,837 | 56 | 62 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Monteiro | Debbie Spence Nasim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1980 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 11–21 | 34.4% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |