H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Claudia Monteiro vs Kim Jones H2H: 0-2

Kim Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Claudia Monteiro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Jones leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Jones won the 1983 US Open round of 64 7-5 6-2.

H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 68

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Jones 7-5 6-2 Claudia Monteiro Match data Sep 2, 1983* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Kim Jones 7-6 6-2 Claudia Monteiro Match data Aug 10, 1983* R64 Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudia Monteiro 1,619 51 95 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kim Jones 1,800 60 103 36.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudia Monteiro Kim Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1980 5–10 33.3% 1,466 0 0
20 1981 10–14 41.7% 1,495 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
21 1982 9–16 36.0% 1,563 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
22 1983 11–21 34.4% 1,550 0 0 1980 1–10 9.1% 1,422 0 0
23 1984 6–12 33.3% 1,535 0 0 1981 6–13 31.6% 1,458 0 0
24 1985 3–2 60.0% 1,564 0 0 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,483 0 0
25 1986 5–11 31.2% 1,540 0 0 1983 20–14 58.8% 1,757 0 1
26 1987 2–9 18.2% 1,453 0 0 1984 13–24 35.1% 1,667 0 1
27 1985 13–18 41.9% 1,724 0 1
28 1986 2–4 33.3% 1,677 0 1
29 1987 0–4 0.0% 1,629 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudia Monteiro Kim Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1980 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1981 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1983 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 1980 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1985 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
25 1986 2 8 10 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 1987 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1984 4 6 10 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 5 7 12 41.7%
27 1985 4 7 11 36.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
28 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
Career 10 27 37 27.0% 11 21 32 34.4% 9 17 26 34.6% 8 15 23 34.8% 17 35 52 32.7% 6 15 21 28.6% 13 17 30 43.3% 23 34 57 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudia Monteiro Kim Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1980 1466 107.0 +4 30.8% -1.23 +0.28
20 1981 1495 109.6 -10 46.2% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.05 1978 1506 102.4 50.0% -0.75 -0.08
21 1982 1564 124.9 -47 +10 -4 44.2% -0.35 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 102.0 +0.06 1979 1490 +0.09
22 1983 1550 107.7 -15 +44 -22 36.5% -1.09 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 100.8 +2.18 1980 1423 94.6 +36 27.6% -1.83 1–6 (14%) 1–2 (33%) 93.2 +0.50
23 1984 1535 106.9 -49 +42 +30 39.5% -0.72 2–5 (29%) 0–2 +0.96 1981 1459 107.5 +44 +75 34.9% -1.44 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +1.50
24 1985 1565 114.0 +19 58.3% +0.75 1–1 2–0 +0.21 1982 1484 103.7 -68 -7 +110 25.0% -2.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.59
25 1986 1540 106.9 -94 +88 31.3% -1.00 0–2 1–4 (20%) +0.53 1983 1758 131.9 -40 -92 54.3% +0.41 9–4 (69%) 3–6 (33%) 108.3 +1.43
26 1987 1453 97.0 -29 +88 37.0% -0.56 1–6 (14%) 2–2 (50%) +1.84 1984 1667 132.6 +24 -136 -35 40.2% -0.94 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 98.4 -3.22
27 1985 1725 135.5 -10 -76 43.7% -0.72 4–5 (44%) 7–4 (64%) 102.6 -1.52
28 1986 1677 104.5 -12 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.70
29 1987 1629 103.9 -23 11.1% -2.67 0–1 -0.24
Career 1620 113.4 -43 +16 +27 39.6% -0.71 14–28 (33%) 14–12 (54%) 96.4 +4.18 1801 126.3 -7 -14 -43 40.1% -0.88 24–32 (43%) 19–20 (49%) 100.6 -0.88

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.