H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Claudia Porwik vs Sabrina Goles H2H: 1-1
Claudia Porwik and Sabrina Goles are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on clay, while Sabrina Goles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1989 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1989* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Claudia Porwik | 6-4 6-2 | Sabrina Goles | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1988* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sabrina Goles | 6-4 6-1 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabrina Goles | #379 | #27 | 25 | 1,843 | 113 | 118 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudia Porwik | Sabrina Goles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #55 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #29 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #59 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #105 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #205 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |