H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Claudine Schaul vs Els Callens H2H: 1-0
Claudine Schaul holds a 1–0 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudine Schaul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudine Schaul won the 2005 Antwerp third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LUX
Age 42
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Claudine Schaul | 6-3 6-4 | Els Callens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudine Schaul | #1,188 | #41 | 767 | 1,675 | 27 | 48 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Claudine Schaul | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #339 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2003 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #174 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |