H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Claudine Schaul vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 0-1

Lilia Osterloh holds a 1–0 lead over Claudine Schaul in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lilia Osterloh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2001 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudine Schaul
LUX Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lilia Osterloh #41 6-4 6-1 Claudine Schaul #227 Match data May 24, 2001* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudine Schaul #1,188 #41 767 1,675 27 49 35.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudine Schaul Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2000 1–1 50.0% #339 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2001 0–2 0.0% #260 1,486 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #133 1,500 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2003 8–8 50.0% #80 1,590 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2004 13–21 38.2% #61 1,552 0 1 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2005 4–15 21.1% #174 1,467 0 1 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudine Schaul Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2004 6 13 19 31.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 16 29 45 35.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudine Schaul Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2000 1510 105.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2001 1486 95.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1501 106.4 — — — — +36 — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.54 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2003 1590 125.3 +0.67 +0.90 1.082 52.2% +11 — — 47.2% -0.08 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.68 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2004 1553 117.8 -0.10 -0.05 0.966 49.5% -49 +83 +26 40.0% -1.04 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -0.41 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2005 1468 102.3 -4.86 -0.99 0.642 38.4% -24 +119 +74 23.7% -1.97 1–1 0–2 — -0.42 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 1675 117.0 -1.10 -0.05 0.886 47.4% -21 +97 +47 36.4% -1.15 7–11 (39%) 10–7 (59%) 101.2 -2.64 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.