H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Claudine Schaul vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-0

Claudine Schaul holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudine Schaul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudine Schaul won the 2004 New Haven round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Claudine Schaul
LUX Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Claudine Schaul #51 6-4 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #52 Match data Aug 26, 2004* R32 New Haven Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Claudine Schaul #1,188 #41 767 1,675 27 49 35.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Claudine Schaul Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2000 1–1 50.0% #339 1,510 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 2001 0–2 0.0% #260 1,486 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2002 1–2 33.3% #133 1,500 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2003 8–8 50.0% #80 1,590 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2004 13–21 38.2% #61 1,552 0 1 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2005 4–15 21.1% #174 1,467 0 1 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Claudine Schaul Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 6 13 19 31.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2005 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 29 45 35.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Claudine Schaul Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2000 1510 105.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.07 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 2001 1486 95.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2002 1501 106.4 — — — — +36 — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.54 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2003 1590 125.3 +0.67 +0.90 1.082 52.2% +11 — — 47.2% -0.08 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.68 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2004 1553 117.8 -0.10 -0.05 0.966 49.5% -49 +83 +26 40.0% -1.04 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -0.41 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2005 1468 102.3 -4.86 -0.99 0.642 38.4% -24 +119 +74 23.7% -1.97 1–1 0–2 — -0.42 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1675 117.0 -1.10 -0.05 0.886 47.4% -21 +97 +47 36.4% -1.15 7–11 (39%) 10–7 (59%) 101.2 -2.64 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.