H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Amanda Anisimova H2H: 1-2
Amanda Anisimova holds a 2–1 lead over Coco Gauff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay, while Amanda Anisimova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2025 Beijing semifinal 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 24
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2025 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Amanda Anisimova | 6-1 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Amanda Anisimova | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| May 22, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-3 | Amanda Anisimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Amanda Anisimova | #9 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,123 | 172 | 103 | 62.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Amanda Anisimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,902 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,867 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,112 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #9 | 1,999 | 0 | 4 |