H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Angelique Kerber H2H: 1-1
Coco Gauff and Angelique Kerber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay, while Angelique Kerber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2022 Rome second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2022* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-1 6-4 | Angelique Kerber | Match data |
| Jul 6, 2021* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Angelique Kerber | 6-4 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Angelique Kerber | #205 | #1 | 9,080 | 2,045 | 461 | 270 | 63.1% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Angelique Kerber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2007 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2010 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #32 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 57–20 | 74.0% | #5 | 1,983 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 1,947 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #10 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 54–16 | 77.1% | #1 | 2,024 | 2 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #21 | 1,767 | 2 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #2 | 1,924 | 3 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,800 | 3 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,764 | 3 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #16 | 1,933 | 3 | 13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,878 | 3 | 14 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #205 | 1,788 | 3 | 14 |