H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Daria Kasatkina H2H: 0-3
Daria Kasatkina holds a 3–0 lead over Coco Gauff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2022 Fort Worth Finals round-robin match 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2022 | Fort Worth Finals | WTA Finals | RR | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2022* | Stuttgart | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Mar 20, 2019* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-3 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Daria Kasatkina | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 |