H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Dayana Yastremska H2H: 3-1
Coco Gauff holds a 3–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 3–0 on clay, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2025 Wimbledon first round 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Dayana Yastremska | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Apr 24, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 0-6 6-2 7-5 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-2 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2024* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 6-4 6-1 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 |