H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Katie Boulter H2H: 2-1
Coco Gauff holds a 2–1 lead over Katie Boulter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2024 Beijing third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2024* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 7-5 6-2 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2023* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-2 6-2 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2021* | Gippsland Trophy | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Katie Boulter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 |