H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Magda Linette H2H: 3-1
Coco Gauff holds a 3–1 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Gauff leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2025 Rome third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Coco Gauff | 7-5 6-3 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Mar 24, 2025 | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Magda Linette | 6-4 6-4 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-0 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |