H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Coco Gauff vs Polona Hercog H2H: 1-0

Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Polona Hercog in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2019 Wimbledon third round 3-6 7-6(7) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Gauff
United States Age 22 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Polona Hercog
Slovenia Age 35 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Gauff #313 3-6 7-6(7) 7-5 Polona Hercog #60 Match data Jul 7, 2019* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Gauff #4 #2 8,173 2,176 285 113 71.6% 2 4 1 1 4 12
Polona Hercog #236 #35 1,605 1,767 170 214 44.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Gauff Polona Hercog
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2019 11–5 68.8% #68 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2020 10–8 55.6% #48 1,782 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #375 1,488 0 0
17 2021 35–16 68.6% #22 1,897 0 2 2008 0–2 0.0% #245 1,470 0 0
18 2022 38–22 63.3% #7 1,927 0 2 2009 6–8 42.9% #68 1,501 0 0
19 2023 51–16 76.1% #3 2,107 1 6 2010 26–24 52.0% #47 1,633 0 0
20 2024 54–17 76.1% #3 2,119 1 9 2011 27–25 51.9% #36 1,698 0 1
21 2025 43–16 72.9% #3 2,100 2 11 2012 14–21 40.0% #76 1,665 0 2
22 2026 43–13 76.8% #4 2,159 2 12 2013 10–10 50.0% #65 1,673 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2014 12–16 42.9% #97 1,638 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 2015 19–23 45.2% #73 1,606 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2016 10–18 35.7% #143 1,558 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #101 1,571 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 2018 15–19 44.1% #85 1,623 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2019 19–21 47.5% #49 1,715 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2020 6–8 42.9% #49 1,684 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 2021 4–15 21.1% #134 1,589 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #236 1,586 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Gauff Polona Hercog
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2019 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2021 15 10 25 60.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2022 23 16 39 59.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
19 2023 40 9 49 81.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2010 13 13 26 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2024 35 10 45 77.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2025 25 11 36 69.4% 18 3 21 85.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 4 12 16 25.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2026 28 7 35 80.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2013 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 10 15 25 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 8 9 11.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 4 9 13 30.8% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 14 20 30.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 182 73 255 71.4% 77 26 103 74.8% 26 14 40 65.0% — — — — — 62 117 179 34.6% 97 75 172 56.4% 11 21 32 34.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 352/384 of Polona Hercog's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Gauff Polona Hercog
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2019 16/16 2.8 4.8 65.0% 63.7% 42.2% 52.0% 54.1% 56.1% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 18/18 3.1 8.3 61.0% 69.1% 42.3% 46.5% 55.8% 58.6% 41.7% 2007 1/1 6.0 5.0 69.5% 58.5% 36.1% 41.7% 80.0% 51.7% 39.4%
17 2021 49/51 5.1 5.3 60.9% 69.1% 47.5% 55.5% 44.3% 60.6% 44.5% 2008 1/2 0.0 5.0 84.0% 47.1% 23.1% 41.7% 62.5% 43.2% 45.7%
18 2022 58/60 4.1 5.3 63.1% 67.1% 45.3% 57.8% 49.0% 59.2% 45.2% 2009 13/14 2.1 2.8 61.8% 62.6% 45.1% 51.3% 42.4% 55.6% 39.8%
19 2023 66/67 3.9 3.3 60.1% 68.8% 48.2% 56.6% 51.7% 60.7% 46.1% 2010 46/50 2.2 2.7 62.0% 64.2% 48.6% 54.1% 48.1% 58.3% 42.8%
20 2024 68/71 3.6 6.1 58.4% 73.6% 45.5% 56.7% 52.8% 62.1% 49.7% 2011 46/52 2.6 2.7 65.1% 62.0% 48.8% 53.0% 47.3% 57.5% 41.9%
21 2025 54/60 2.7 6.9 62.4% 67.8% 45.3% 49.7% 57.7% 59.4% 49.6% 2012 33/35 2.2 2.4 60.0% 62.3% 44.3% 46.0% 48.7% 54.8% 40.5%
22 2026 51/56 3.1 4.9 63.3% 68.3% 44.1% 49.5% 48.2% 59.5% 48.1% 2013 14/20 2.7 2.5 66.6% 64.4% 51.1% 53.5% 45.6% 60.1% 42.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 24/28 3.0 2.8 57.1% 63.5% 46.2% 54.4% 38.9% 55.9% 39.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 37/42 2.8 3.1 63.8% 65.6% 52.4% 50.3% 53.0% 60.8% 40.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 26/28 2.0 3.4 58.7% 59.2% 43.1% 50.2% 52.7% 52.7% 43.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 3.8 3.8 60.4% 66.7% 48.5% 45.5% 48.2% 59.6% 45.1%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 34/34 3.2 3.9 55.6% 63.3% 48.9% 62.2% 37.8% 56.8% 41.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 39/40 3.5 4.3 55.9% 67.1% 48.4% 54.9% 46.8% 58.6% 40.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 2.1 3.4 56.8% 63.2% 46.7% 52.4% 53.1% 55.6% 44.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 19/19 3.4 3.6 55.4% 63.7% 43.6% 44.1% 34.2% 55.0% 39.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 1/1 0.0 1.0 37.5% 100.0% 40.0% — — 62.5% 14.3%
Career — 380/399 3.7 5.4 61.4% 69.0% 45.7% 54.1% 51.2% 60.1% 46.8% — 352/384 2.7 3.2 60.1% 63.7% 47.5% 52.3% 46.3% 57.1% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Gauff Polona Hercog
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2019 1694 127.4 -0.40 -1.45 0.957 49.2% -25 — +15 57.1% -0.11 5–0 (100%) 3–0 (100%) 110.5 +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2020 1782 144.9 +0.78 +0.22 1.007 50.4% -13 -207 — 57.8% +0.27 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -1.08 2007 1489 100.3 -2.72 -1.27 0.816 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
17 2021 1898 145.4 +3.52 +2.26 1.130 52.5% -104 +9 -86 60.2% +0.65 13–6 (68%) 10–7 (59%) 108.1 +0.08 2008 1470 102.5 -2.06 -1.94 0.805 44.4% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.18
18 2022 1927 158.3 +2.88 +2.90 1.106 52.0% -48 +73 -46 62.5% +0.84 6–4 (60%) 10–6 (63%) 103.4 -1.68 2009 1501 106.8 +0.29 -3.10 0.898 48.1% -40 +89 — 40.6% -0.53 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 +0.08
19 2023 2107 166.1 +4.50 +4.45 1.173 53.4% +40 -131 -245 70.9% +1.39 11–5 (69%) 8–1 (89%) 106.9 -0.71 2010 1634 130.1 +2.35 -0.89 1.024 50.4% -68 +49 — 50.0% +0.14 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -0.18
20 2024 2120 167.7 +4.83 +6.58 1.311 55.6% +53 -73 -151 70.9% +1.78 12–8 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 99.0 +0.77 2011 1699 128.3 +1.64 -2.16 0.985 49.5% -94 +106 -139 51.3% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 -0.20
21 2025 2101 167.3 +2.64 +6.44 1.221 54.4% +20 +119 — 66.9% +1.29 12–3 (80%) 10–6 (63%) 106.5 +0.39 2012 1666 121.2 -0.89 -2.18 0.897 47.5% -100 +153 — 40.3% -0.94 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 101.7 -1.34
22 2026 2159 167.0 +3.17 +5.97 1.186 53.6% +51 +13 -195 68.6% +1.34 17–10 (63%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -0.08 2013 1674 131.4 +2.50 +0.02 1.065 51.3% -74 +126 — 52.2% +0.52 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.8 -0.86
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1639 121.6 -0.49 -2.45 0.903 48.0% -47 +97 -116 43.5% -0.42 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 100.2 -1.81
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1606 121.6 +1.66 -0.91 1.034 50.7% -33 +93 -84 49.5% -0.03 5–14 (26%) 4–5 (44%) 91.7 +0.24
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1559 116.5 -2.35 +0.40 0.926 48.3% -25 +109 -113 42.4% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 98.5 -1.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1571 105.5 +0.03 -1.29 1.118 51.8% — — -87 50.0% +0.60 1–1 0–2 — +0.25
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1624 119.4 -0.20 -1.09 0.959 49.0% -61 +57 -123 45.8% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.53
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1715 133.2 +1.87 -1.25 0.983 49.7% -111 +63 -107 47.9% -0.16 8–10 (44%) 6–10 (38%) 98.0 -0.38
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1685 125.8 +0.14 +0.43 0.991 50.0% -59 +53 — 48.5% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1590 121.5 -0.67 -1.96 0.871 46.9% -38 +130 — 30.4% -1.39 2–6 (25%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 -1.36
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1581 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1577 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1620 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1586 99.1 -0.36 -0.84 0.381 40.0% — — — — — — — — -0.19
Career — 2176 166.5 +3.36 +4.35 1.171 53.3% +7 +2 -129 66.2% +1.15 79–42 (65%) 61–33 (65%) 113.8 -0.55 — 1767 129.3 +0.66 -1.31 0.965 49.2% -68 +90 -110 46.2% -0.23 49–74 (40%) 32–56 (36%) 87.4 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.