Coco Gauff
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 3 | 11 | 14 | May 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 7 | 13 | Mar 28, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 6 | 5 | 11 | Aug 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 5 | 5 | 10 | Aug 23, 2026 | H2H |
| Paula Badosa | 4 | 5 | 9 | Sep 3, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Tamara Zidansek H2H: 1-0
Coco Gauff holds a 1–0 lead over Tamara Zidansek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2024 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-4 | Tamara Zidansek | Match data | May 30, 2024* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,176 | 285 | 113 | 71.6% | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Tamara Zidansek | #146 | #22 | 1,991 | 1,803 | 80 | 91 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,119 | 1 | 9 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,100 | 2 | 11 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 43–13 | 76.8% | #4 | 2,159 | 2 | 12 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #146 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2019 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 23 | 16 | 39 | 59.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 40 | 9 | 49 | 81.6% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 35 | 10 | 45 | 77.8% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2018 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2019 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 2026 | 28 | 7 | 35 | 80.0% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2020 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 16 | 5 | 21 | 76.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 182 | 73 | 255 | 71.4% | 77 | 26 | 103 | 74.8% | 26 | 14 | 40 | 65.0% | — | 34 | 51 | 85 | 40.0% | 42 | 33 | 75 | 56.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/399 of Coco Gauff's and 164/170 of Tamara Zidansek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2019 | 16/16 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 65.0% | 63.7% | 42.2% | 52.0% | 54.1% | 56.1% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 18/18 | 3.1 | 8.3 | 61.0% | 69.1% | 42.3% | 46.5% | 55.8% | 58.6% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 49/51 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 60.9% | 69.1% | 47.5% | 55.5% | 44.3% | 60.6% | 44.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 58/60 | 4.1 | 5.3 | 63.1% | 67.1% | 45.3% | 57.8% | 49.0% | 59.2% | 45.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 66/67 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 60.1% | 68.8% | 48.2% | 56.6% | 51.7% | 60.7% | 46.1% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 68.3% | 46.5% | 55.0% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 49.2% | 38.9% |
| 20 | 2024 | 68/71 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 58.4% | 73.6% | 45.5% | 56.7% | 52.8% | 62.1% | 49.7% | 2018 | 14/14 | 0.6 | 3.5 | 65.4% | 57.7% | 42.3% | 44.7% | 51.2% | 52.5% | 48.6% |
| 21 | 2025 | 54/60 | 2.7 | 6.9 | 62.4% | 67.8% | 45.3% | 49.7% | 57.7% | 59.4% | 49.6% | 2019 | 33/34 | 1.2 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 58.2% | 42.0% | 53.9% | 44.6% | 53.1% | 42.8% |
| 22 | 2026 | 51/56 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 63.3% | 68.3% | 44.1% | 49.5% | 48.2% | 59.5% | 48.1% | 2020 | 15/15 | 0.7 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 59.5% | 47.5% | 55.0% | 48.5% | 55.6% | 43.3% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 41/43 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 64.9% | 62.8% | 45.6% | 49.4% | 50.9% | 56.7% | 45.0% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 30/32 | 1.3 | 3.6 | 63.1% | 61.5% | 42.8% | 49.8% | 48.5% | 54.3% | 41.4% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14/14 | 0.5 | 3.7 | 68.0% | 54.9% | 43.2% | 53.3% | 54.1% | 51.1% | 46.1% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10/10 | 0.4 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 57.8% | 38.8% | 46.4% | 36.2% | 51.2% | 40.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6/7 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 59.6% | 64.0% | 44.6% | 51.1% | 61.9% | 55.8% | 47.8% |
| Career | — | 380/399 | 3.7 | 5.4 | 61.4% | 69.0% | 45.7% | 54.1% | 51.2% | 60.1% | 46.8% | — | 164/171 | 1.0 | 3.5 | 65.7% | 59.9% | 43.7% | 50.7% | 48.9% | 54.2% | 43.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Tamara Zidansek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1694 | 127.4 | -0.40 | -1.45 | 0.957 | 49.2% | -25 | — | +15 | 57.1% | -0.11 | 5–0 (100%) | 3–0 (100%) | 110.5 | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 1782 | 144.9 | +0.78 | +0.22 | 1.007 | 50.4% | -13 | -207 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.2 | -1.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2021 | 1898 | 145.4 | +3.52 | +2.26 | 1.130 | 52.5% | -104 | +9 | -86 | 60.2% | +0.65 | 13–6 (68%) | 10–7 (59%) | 108.1 | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 1927 | 158.3 | +2.88 | +2.90 | 1.106 | 52.0% | -48 | +73 | -46 | 62.5% | +0.84 | 6–4 (60%) | 10–6 (63%) | 103.4 | -1.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 2107 | 166.1 | +4.50 | +4.45 | 1.173 | 53.4% | +40 | -131 | -245 | 70.9% | +1.39 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–1 (89%) | 106.9 | -0.71 | 2017 | 1484 | 98.5 | -0.11 | -0.64 | 0.766 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 20 | 2024 | 2120 | 167.7 | +4.83 | +6.58 | 1.311 | 55.6% | +53 | -73 | -151 | 70.9% | +1.78 | 12–8 (60%) | 9–7 (56%) | 99.0 | +0.77 | 2018 | 1632 | 116.1 | -1.96 | +2.38 | 1.024 | 50.4% | -117 | +98 | — | 55.2% | +0.24 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 |
| 21 | 2025 | 2101 | 167.3 | +2.64 | +6.44 | 1.221 | 54.4% | +20 | +119 | — | 66.9% | +1.29 | 12–3 (80%) | 10–6 (63%) | 106.5 | +0.39 | 2019 | 1642 | 115.3 | -2.75 | -0.57 | 0.912 | 48.3% | -135 | +147 | -8 | 43.4% | -0.60 | 9–8 (53%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.4 | -0.17 |
| 22 | 2026 | 2159 | 167.0 | +3.18 | +5.97 | 1.186 | 53.6% | +51 | +13 | -194 | 68.6% | +1.34 | 17–10 (63%) | 8–4 (67%) | 105.5 | -0.08 | 2020 | 1613 | 128.8 | -0.74 | +0.40 | 0.974 | 49.8% | -65 | +134 | — | 47.2% | -0.06 | 1–5 (17%) | 3–2 (60%) | 96.1 | -0.44 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1727 | 132.9 | +0.46 | +0.75 | 1.038 | 50.9% | -162 | +227 | — | 54.1% | +0.16 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.2 | +0.90 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1596 | 120.1 | -1.76 | -0.99 | 0.907 | 47.9% | +16 | +119 | -18 | 41.7% | -0.61 | 6–6 (50%) | 6–6 (50%) | 99.0 | +1.49 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1678 | 119.9 | -2.90 | +0.63 | 0.942 | 48.6% | -80 | +129 | — | 48.5% | -0.64 | 1–4 (20%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.0 | -0.10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1638 | 109.0 | -2.73 | -2.13 | 0.825 | 45.6% | -61 | +156 | — | 36.0% | -1.32 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1593 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1696 | 113.2 | -0.30 | +0.61 | 1.081 | 51.7% | -12 | +35 | — | 52.9% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.34 |
| Career | — | 2176 | 166.5 | +3.36 | +4.35 | 1.171 | 53.3% | +7 | +2 | -129 | 66.2% | +1.15 | 79–42 (65%) | 61–33 (65%) | 113.8 | -0.55 | — | 1804 | 125.4 | -1.42 | +0.07 | 0.958 | 49.2% | -86 | +153 | -14 | 46.9% | -0.34 | 33–32 (51%) | 27–16 (63%) | 106.1 | +0.86 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Tamara Zidansek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 1 | 5 | 6 | Oct 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jan 13, 2025 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Anna Kalinskaya | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 14, 2022 | H2H |
| Petra Martic | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 12, 2022 | H2H |