H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Coco Gauff vs Xinyu Wang H2H: 2-1
Coco Gauff holds a 2–1 lead over Xinyu Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Coco Gauff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Gauff won the 2025 Cincinnati second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 22
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 24
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2025 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Coco Gauff | 6-3 6-2 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2025 | Berlin | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Xinyu Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Coco Gauff | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2022* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Coco Gauff | 6-0 6-4 | Xinyu Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Gauff | #4 | #2 | 8,173 | 2,158 | 268 | 110 | 70.9% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| Xinyu Wang | #40 | #30 | 1,581 | 1,857 | 105 | 121 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Gauff | Xinyu Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #68 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2020 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2021 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #22 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #7 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2023 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #3 | 2,107 | 1 | 6 | 2021 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2024 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,125 | 1 | 9 | 2022 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #86 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2025 | 43–16 | 72.9% | #3 | 2,102 | 2 | 11 | 2023 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2026 | 28–11 | 71.8% | #4 | 2,092 | 2 | 11 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #40 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |