H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 2-5

Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 5–2 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 US Open third round 7-5 4-6 6-4.

USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
POL Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 2017* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #22 7-5 4-6 6-4 Agnieszka Radwanska #11 Match data
Aug 9, 2017* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #10 6-3 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #20 Match data
Jun 16, 2016* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #32 7-5 4-6 6-3 Agnieszka Radwanska #3 Match data
Oct 7, 2015* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #8 6-3 (ret.) Coco Vandeweghe #41 Match data
Sep 24, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #13 6-3 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #45 Match data
Aug 27, 2015* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #15 6-0 6-2 Coco Vandeweghe #43 Match data
Oct 1, 2014* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Agnieszka Radwanska #6 6-4 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Agnieszka Radwanska #74 #2 8,530 2,081 506 237 68.1% 0 5 1 8 6 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Agnieszka Radwanska
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2006 11–8 57.9% #61 1,673 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2007 27–19 58.7% #26 1,808 0 1
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2008 51–19 72.9% #10 1,926 0 4
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2009 44–23 65.7% #10 1,910 0 4
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2010 32–18 64.0% #14 1,860 0 4
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2011 46–18 71.9% #8 1,979 0 7
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2012 59–19 75.6% #4 1,994 0 10
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2013 56–20 73.7% #5 1,957 0 13
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2014 43–22 66.2% #6 1,872 0 14
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2015 50–22 69.4% #5 1,957 0 17
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2016 51–18 73.9% #3 1,942 0 20
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2017 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 20
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2018 11–13 45.8% #74 1,727 0 20
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2