H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Coco Vandeweghe vs Caroline Wozniacki H2H: 1-1
Coco Vandeweghe and Caroline Wozniacki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass, while Caroline Wozniacki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Wimbledon fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 36
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Coco Vandeweghe | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Caroline Wozniacki | Match data |
| Apr 3, 2014* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Caroline Wozniacki | 6-3 7-6(4) | Coco Vandeweghe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coco Vandeweghe | #815 | #9 | 3,258 | 1,877 | 138 | 151 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Caroline Wozniacki | #289 | #1 | 10,255 | 2,153 | 605 | 269 | 69.2% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Coco Vandeweghe | Caroline Wozniacki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #476 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #60 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #322 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #12 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 2010 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 1,894 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 2,106 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #97 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 63–17 | 78.8% | #1 | 1,987 | 0 | 18 |
| 21 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #113 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #10 | 1,972 | 0 | 20 |
| 22 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #39 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #10 | 1,914 | 0 | 21 |
| 23 | 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,010 | 0 | 22 |
| 24 | 2016 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,814 | 0 | 23 |
| 25 | 2017 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #10 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,885 | 0 | 25 |
| 26 | 2018 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 60–22 | 73.2% | #3 | 1,975 | 0 | 27 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #241 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #3 | 1,913 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #38 | 1,835 | 1 | 29 |
| 29 | 2021 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #174 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #36 | 1,844 | 1 | 29 |
| 30 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #128 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,533 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #249 | 1,856 | 1 | 29 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #70 | 1,840 | 1 | 29 |