H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Christina Mchale H2H: 2-1

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 2–1 lead over Christina Mchale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on grass, while Christina Mchale leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Christina Mchale
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2017* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #30 6-4 6-2 Christina Mchale #59 Match data
Jun 17, 2016* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #32 6-3 7-6(2) Christina Mchale #68 Match data
Aug 6, 2015* Washington WTA 500 R32 Hard Christina Mchale #62 6-2 4-6 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Christina Mchale #319 #24 1,935 1,803 166 207 44.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Christina Mchale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #231 1,499 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2010 8–9 47.1% #109 1,556 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2011 19–17 52.8% #43 1,716 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2012 21–20 51.2% #33 1,676 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2013 13–18 41.9% #66 1,636 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2014 20–21 48.8% #52 1,647 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2015 18–21 46.2% #63 1,635 0 0
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2016 24–21 53.3% #45 1,698 0 1
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2017 19–26 42.2% #64 1,690 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2018 8–17 32.0% #151 1,568 0 1
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2019 7–10 41.2% #88 1,652 0 1
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2020 6–8 42.9% #81 1,675 0 1
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2021 2–16 11.1% #159 1,524 0 1
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2022 0–1 0.0% #319 1,452 0 1
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —