H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Klara Koukalova H2H: 2-2

Coco Vandeweghe and Klara Koukalova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Klara Koukalova leads 2–1 on grass, while Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Klara Koukalova won the 2015 Birmingham second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Klara Koukalova
CZE Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2015* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Klara Koukalova #92 7-5 6-3 Coco Vandeweghe #35 Match data
Jun 16, 2014 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 SF Grass Coco Vandeweghe #69 6-4 6-2 Klara Koukalova #31 Match data
Jun 13, 2014* Birmingham WTA 500 R16 Grass Klara Koukalova #33 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #75 Match data
Sep 29, 2010* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #172 6-4 7-6(6) Klara Koukalova #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Klara Koukalova #566 #20 1,860 1,807 275 285 49.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Klara Koukalova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2001 5–4 55.6% #139 1,519 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2002 4–5 44.4% #117 1,527 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2003 14–19 42.4% #63 1,537 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2004 26–22 54.2% #46 1,648 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2005 32–19 62.7% #35 1,770 0 2
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2006 10–22 31.2% #117 1,548 0 2
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2007 12–12 50.0% #63 1,579 0 2
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2008 21–21 50.0% #72 1,590 0 2
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2009 8–17 32.0% #90 1,537 0 2
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2010 20–20 50.0% #41 1,656 0 2
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2011 29–25 53.7% #41 1,712 0 2
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2012 24–21 53.3% #28 1,729 0 2
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,679 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2014 29–27 51.8% #40 1,611 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2015 14–22 38.9% #99 1,572 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 0–4 0.0% #400 1,499 0 3