H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 2-3

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–2 lead over Coco Vandeweghe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 US Open fourth round 6-4 7-6(2).

USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 5, 2017* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #22 6-4 7-6(2) Lucie Safarova #37 Match data
Mar 11, 2017* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #40 4-6 6-4 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #22 Match data
May 2, 2016 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lucie Safarova #13 7-6(4) 6-1 Coco Vandeweghe #36 Match data
Aug 20, 2015* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #6 6-4 7-5 Coco Vandeweghe #46 Match data
Jul 7, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #47 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Lucie Safarova #6 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7