H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-0

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 1–0 lead over Mona Barthel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Mona Barthel
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #25 7-5 6-2 Mona Barthel #48 Match data Jul 5, 2017* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mona Barthel #205 #23 1,762 1,840 151 182 45.3% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Mona Barthel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #195 1,493 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2011 5–6 45.5% #69 1,552 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2012 29–24 54.7% #39 1,682 0 1
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2013 24–22 52.2% #34 1,646 0 2
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2014 23–23 50.0% #42 1,713 0 3
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2015 24–26 48.0% #45 1,670 0 3
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2016 6–13 31.6% #158 1,560 0 3
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2017 17–18 48.6% #48 1,602 0 4
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2018 14–20 41.2% #77 1,625 0 4
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2019 6–13 31.6% #183 1,549 0 4
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2021 3–12 20.0% #275 1,457 0 4
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2024 0–2 0.0% #171 1,525 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2026 0–2 0.0% #205 1,556 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Mona Barthel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 21 14 35 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2013 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2014 11 14 25 44.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2015 18 16 34 52.9% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 4 8 12 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 9 15 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 8 12 20 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2021 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — — — 96 104 200 48.0% 38 51 89 42.7% 10 25 35 28.6% 7 2 9 77.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 309/334 of Mona Barthel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Mona Barthel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2010 1/1 6.0 2.0 64.3% 66.7% 52.0% 60.0% 0.0% 61.4% 31.3%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2011 11/11 2.1 4.2 61.8% 63.6% 38.0% 50.5% 45.8% 53.6% 43.1%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2012 50/53 4.2 5.7 53.8% 70.4% 46.7% 53.9% 50.1% 59.2% 46.4%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2013 46/46 3.3 3.4 61.5% 66.4% 45.6% 56.9% 46.0% 58.5% 43.7%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2014 43/46 2.5 4.0 61.4% 64.9% 45.0% 55.3% 46.4% 57.1% 43.0%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2015 35/50 3.5 3.7 59.3% 64.0% 49.5% 47.1% 42.6% 58.1% 41.4%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2016 18/20 3.8 5.6 55.2% 66.7% 43.9% 50.0% 46.3% 56.8% 39.4%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2017 34/35 4.1 5.1 61.2% 65.8% 43.6% 53.5% 46.5% 56.9% 42.2%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2018 34/34 5.0 6.3 57.7% 66.0% 43.3% 56.9% 45.8% 56.3% 39.8%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2019 19/19 4.1 6.3 57.6% 67.5% 41.5% 48.3% 42.4% 56.3% 38.3%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% 2021 14/15 5.4 6.3 53.6% 68.6% 42.3% 49.5% 37.8% 56.5% 37.1%
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 2.5 10.0 51.7% 54.0% 44.0% 14.3% 32.5% 49.3% 42.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 2/2 1.0 7.5 59.7% 62.5% 38.1% 53.3% 30.6% 52.6% 43.5%
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 309/334 3.8 4.9 58.5% 66.4% 44.9% 52.9% 45.4% 57.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Mona Barthel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2010 1493 100.8 +1.29 +0.85 0.810 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.14
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2011 1552 119.1 -0.55 -0.55 0.929 48.7% +28 -19 — 45.8% -0.46 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.58
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2012 1682 144.4 +3.00 +2.35 1.139 52.8% +34 -50 -166 57.8% +0.69 3–11 (21%) 10–12 (45%) 92.9 -2.53
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2013 1646 138.9 +2.09 +0.25 1.053 51.1% +80 -90 -184 53.4% +0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 97.5 -0.66
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2014 1713 124.3 +1.01 -0.81 1.002 50.2% -62 -24 -158 50.5% -0.09 5–6 (45%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.80
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2015 1671 128.2 -0.49 -0.40 0.986 49.6% +10 -45 — 51.7% +0.24 10–14 (42%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +2.15
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2016 1561 109.3 +0.53 -2.53 0.913 48.2% +29 +35 -55 37.8% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.82
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2017 1602 121.9 +0.49 -0.40 0.977 49.6% -11 +63 -97 48.8% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 6–2 (75%) 100.9 -0.52
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2018 1625 120.7 -0.13 -2.87 0.910 48.2% +7 -36 -60 42.2% -0.52 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) 102.3 -0.60
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2019 1550 122.1 -0.64 -2.56 0.876 47.5% +130 -29 — 32.6% -1.02 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 -0.70
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2020 1535 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2021 1457 106.9 -0.29 -3.24 0.854 46.7% +105 — — 26.5% -1.44 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.65
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1420 94.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1525 110.3 -2.16 -0.17 0.843 45.9% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1576 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1556 106.9 +0.24 -2.27 0.918 47.9% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1841 131.0 +0.87 -0.58 0.990 49.8% +28 -20 -126 47.5% -0.11 46–65 (41%) 47–51 (48%) 95.2 -1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.