H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 3-1

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–1 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-1 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 18, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #35 6-1 7-6(3) Roberta Vinci #19 Match data
Jul 3, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Coco Vandeweghe #30 6-3 6-4 Roberta Vinci #7 Match data
Jan 8, 2015* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Coco Vandeweghe #38 5-7 6-2 6-3 Roberta Vinci #44 Match data
Feb 23, 2012* Monterrey WTA 500 R32 Hard Roberta Vinci #23 7-5 7-5 Coco Vandeweghe #156 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,877 138 151 47.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,566 0 0 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,544 0 0 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,606 0 0 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2016 22–17 56.4% #36 1,726 0 2 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,856 0 2 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,688 0 2 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,688 0 2 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,592 0 2 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10