H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Vania King H2H: 1-1

Coco Vandeweghe and Vania King are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 1–0 on grass, while Vania King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2014 Libéma Open round of 16 6-7(6) 6-0 2-1 RET.

USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
USA Age 37 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #69 6-7(6) 6-0 2-1 (ret.) Vania King #75 Match data Jun 20, 2014* R16 Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Vania King #55 6-1 3-6 6-4 Coco Vandeweghe #73 Match data Aug 4, 2012* QF Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe — #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Vania King — #50 1,225 1,767 128 161 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Vania King
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,452 0 0 2005 1–1 50.0% #164 1,519 0 0
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 2006 16–13 55.2% #60 1,662 0 1
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,568 0 0 2007 15–22 40.5% #109 1,629 0 1
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2008 7–19 26.9% #128 1,520 0 1
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2009 11–12 47.8% #80 1,592 0 1
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2010 14–17 45.2% #86 1,598 0 1
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2011 13–14 48.1% #76 1,692 0 1
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2012 15–19 44.1% #69 1,618 0 1
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,733 0 2 2013 8–11 42.1% #85 1,631 0 1
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,859 0 2 2014 13–15 46.4% #111 1,650 0 1
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2015 0–1 0.0% #410 1,634 0 1
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,690 0 2 2016 13–11 54.2% #78 1,646 0 1
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2017 1–3 25.0% #492 1,593 0 1
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 2018 1–3 25.0% #356 1,560 0 1
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Vania King
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 15 10 25 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 11 15 26 42.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 9 10 19 47.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2011 9 10 19 47.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 2012 12 13 25 48.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 7 8 15 46.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — 96 110 206 46.6% 26 36 62 41.9% 6 15 21 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 237/289 of Vania King's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Vania King
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% 2005 1/2 3.0 1.0 63.3% 52.6% 36.4% 50.0% 0.0% 46.7% 33.3%
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% 2006 9/29 1.0 1.1 71.3% 60.7% 43.6% 55.0% 59.8% 55.8% 44.1%
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% 2007 21/37 1.2 2.7 63.7% 58.9% 44.6% 48.9% 39.1% 54.0% 37.7%
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2008 25/26 1.5 1.7 66.0% 61.8% 43.9% 51.8% 42.8% 55.6% 39.5%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2009 20/23 0.8 1.9 63.1% 58.0% 46.4% 47.2% 37.3% 53.7% 42.1%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2010 29/31 0.6 2.7 65.9% 61.5% 41.9% 49.4% 41.0% 55.1% 44.8%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2011 24/27 0.6 3.6 64.0% 59.5% 42.2% 53.5% 45.2% 53.2% 44.9%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2012 33/34 0.7 1.7 64.1% 62.4% 47.4% 51.5% 43.8% 57.0% 43.5%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2013 17/19 0.6 2.4 69.2% 57.3% 46.4% 44.7% 46.8% 53.7% 41.1%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2014 25/28 0.7 2.4 64.2% 58.6% 47.1% 50.6% 43.5% 54.3% 42.6%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2015 1/1 1.0 1.0 61.3% 55.3% 33.3% 16.7% 50.0% 46.8% 39.7%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2016 24/24 1.4 2.8 63.1% 64.2% 43.8% 58.8% 50.1% 56.6% 44.1%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2017 4/4 1.0 2.3 70.4% 50.1% 40.7% 56.3% 55.7% 48.5% 38.6%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% 2018 4/4 1.0 2.8 60.3% 52.3% 38.6% 54.3% 41.8% 47.0% 40.7%
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.5% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 237/289 0.9 2.4 65.0% 60.2% 44.5% 51.2% 44.0% 54.7% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Vania King
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1479 103.9 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.4 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +19 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 2005 1520 103.7 -0.64 +0.14 0.625 40.2% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.17
17 2009 1466 104.3 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +12 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 2006 1663 131.1 -1.06 -0.47 0.997 50.5% +24 — — 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 -0.14
18 2010 1568 120.3 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +6 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.24 2007 1629 118.6 -1.36 -3.67 0.818 45.8% +20 -161 +14 42.0% -0.72 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 -1.51
19 2011 1544 108.1 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +39 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.50 2008 1521 117.8 +0.05 -3.22 0.890 47.7% +52 -54 — 33.9% -0.89 5–7 (42%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 -1.10
20 2012 1606 131.2 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2009 1592 115.0 -1.54 -1.39 0.910 48.1% +24 -123 -32 44.9% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +0.35
21 2013 1564 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +54 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2010 1599 118.2 -1.20 +0.84 0.997 49.8% +26 -97 -78 49.3% -0.17 4–9 (31%) 1–4 (20%) 94.1 +0.40
22 2014 1732 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -19 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2011 1692 130.5 -1.09 +0.98 0.960 48.9% -17 -128 — 48.4% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 101.8 -1.31
23 2015 1726 124.2 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -37 -234 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2012 1618 128.3 +0.93 +0.08 1.011 50.1% +21 -45 — 48.0% -0.05 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 -1.01
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +156 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2013 1632 118.3 -0.91 -1.79 0.887 47.5% 0 -44 — 41.7% -0.79 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.1 -0.53
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2014 1650 125.5 -1.58 -0.66 0.932 48.6% +19 -55 -202 49.2% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 105.8 -1.14
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -29 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2015 1635 102.3 +0.69 -0.52 0.746 43.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.02
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2016 1646 125.1 +0.57 +0.85 1.016 50.3% +12 -20 — 53.7% +0.11 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 102.4 +0.71
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2017 1593 108.4 -1.97 -0.89 0.750 44.4% +4 — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.16
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -63 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2018 1560 104.4 -2.66 -1.04 0.768 44.2% +8 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 1–0 — +0.17
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2019 1541 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1880 133.0 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.95 — 1768 128.1 -0.67 -0.73 0.935 48.6% +18 -80 -68 46.0% -0.32 46–50 (48%) 34–30 (53%) 103.9 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.