H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Coco Vandeweghe vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 3-0

Coco Vandeweghe holds a 3–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Coco Vandeweghe leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Coco Vandeweghe won the 2016 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Coco Vandeweghe
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Coco Vandeweghe #32 6-4 6-2 Yanina Wickmayer #49 Match data Jun 18, 2016* QF Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Coco Vandeweghe #75 5-7 7-5 6-1 Yanina Wickmayer #54 Match data Jun 12, 2014* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Coco Vandeweghe #120 6-2 3-6 6-2 Yanina Wickmayer #37 Match data Jul 14, 2012* SF Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Coco Vandeweghe #815 #9 3,258 1,880 138 152 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #549 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 0–3 0.0% #476 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 1–2 33.3% #322 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 6–6 50.0% #116 1,567 0 0 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0
19 2011 8–13 38.1% #122 1,543 0 0 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2
20 2012 6–7 46.2% #97 1,605 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3
21 2013 5–11 31.2% #113 1,563 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3
22 2014 22–14 61.1% #39 1,731 0 1 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3
23 2015 20–21 48.8% #37 1,726 0 1 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3
24 2016 22–18 55.0% #36 1,732 0 2 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2017 29–18 61.7% #10 1,858 0 2 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2018 9–16 36.0% #100 1,690 0 2 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5
27 2019 1–3 25.0% #241 1,689 0 2 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5
28 2020 0–2 0.0% #214 1,624 0 2 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5
29 2021 4–9 30.8% #174 1,591 0 2 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5
30 2022 4–5 44.4% #128 1,666 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5
31 2023 1–2 33.3% #420 1,533 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Yanina Wickmayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 2011 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2012 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2016 10 13 23 43.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2017 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 1 9 10 10.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2021 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 81 107 188 43.1% 16 21 37 43.2% 41 24 65 63.1% — — — — — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/290 of Coco Vandeweghe's and 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 2.0 40.4% 69.6% 38.2% 50.0% 100.0% 50.9% 26.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 7.0 7.0 53.2% 75.8% 41.4% 62.5% 16.7% 59.7% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 3/3 1.3 2.3 58.0% 53.2% 40.3% 36.1% 50.7% 47.4% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 3/3 3.7 0.0 64.6% 54.3% 58.5% 52.3% 36.7% 55.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 11/12 4.5 5.5 58.9% 63.3% 38.8% 49.9% 47.6% 53.0% 42.0% 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4%
19 2011 21/21 3.9 5.3 52.3% 64.7% 44.8% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 39.7% 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6%
20 2012 12/13 5.7 5.1 48.8% 74.1% 45.6% 66.1% 63.0% 59.6% 40.2% 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2%
21 2013 16/16 5.8 4.9 49.7% 68.0% 46.7% 50.2% 43.9% 56.9% 41.9% 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5%
22 2014 36/36 8.5 4.6 53.3% 76.0% 47.8% 52.7% 45.7% 62.8% 40.3% 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2015 34/41 6.8 3.6 54.9% 70.6% 56.0% 60.3% 42.3% 63.9% 37.0% 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2016 38/40 5.9 3.7 54.7% 72.8% 49.4% 54.0% 45.2% 62.3% 41.9% 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2%
25 2017 47/47 5.3 4.3 54.7% 74.4% 50.5% 61.6% 43.8% 63.6% 41.3% 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2%
26 2018 25/25 5.9 5.2 54.5% 69.3% 46.5% 55.0% 43.6% 59.1% 38.2% 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9%
27 2019 4/4 3.5 5.0 45.4% 65.4% 40.8% 48.8% 24.6% 52.3% 35.4% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8%
28 2020 2/2 6.0 7.0 55.9% 70.7% 37.8% 64.6% 22.2% 56.1% 36.7% 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4%
29 2021 13/13 5.8 4.9 55.2% 66.9% 45.9% 39.1% 44.7% 57.6% 37.4% 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3%
30 2022 9/9 6.0 4.4 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 48.0% 40.8% 57.5% 35.7% 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2%
31 2023 3/3 7.3 6.3 49.4% 66.2% 41.4% 41.5% 20.1% 53.6% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6%
Career — 279/290 5.9 4.5 53.8% 70.7% 48.2% 54.6% 44.2% 60.2% 39.6% — 396/440 2.6 4.0 63.9% 63.3% 45.2% 50.9% 46.9% 56.6% 42.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Coco Vandeweghe Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1485 98.4 -1.31 -2.15 0.531 39.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1480 104.6 -2.63 -2.18 0.766 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1453 104.3 +0.09 -1.10 0.713 42.8% +20 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1466 104.1 +1.17 -2.23 0.824 46.3% +13 — — 33.3% -1.83 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1567 119.9 -0.34 -0.02 0.895 47.8% +7 — — 45.8% -0.83 1–1 1–1 — +0.28 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19
19 2011 1543 108.2 -1.37 -3.03 0.887 47.8% +26 — +40 34.8% -0.78 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 102.6 +1.49 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38
20 2012 1605 131.1 +3.23 -0.27 0.996 49.9% +24 — — 48.3% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.31 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09
21 2013 1563 120.9 +0.40 -1.77 0.973 49.4% +55 — — 37.8% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 95.2 +0.12 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40
22 2014 1731 138.8 +5.61 -2.20 1.082 51.2% -19 — -18 55.7% +0.23 7–4 (64%) 7–6 (54%) 106.7 -0.26 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14
23 2015 1726 124.1 +4.83 -2.53 1.026 50.3% -38 -235 +47 51.1% -0.08 8–6 (57%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 -1.43 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49
24 2016 1733 136.0 +5.07 -0.74 1.111 51.7% -68 -242 +155 56.2% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 5–4 (56%) 100.7 -0.72 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61
25 2017 1859 148.2 +6.32 -0.55 1.133 51.9% -29 -280 +61 60.0% +0.45 6–6 (50%) 11–2 (85%) 108.7 -1.00 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93
26 2018 1691 124.0 +2.04 -2.71 0.932 48.6% -31 -30 +160 43.4% -0.55 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -0.76 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27
27 2019 1690 112.5 -0.39 -0.74 0.742 44.1% -7 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.01 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90
28 2020 1624 102.4 -0.35 -1.49 0.835 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.12 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44
29 2021 1591 99.2 -0.08 -3.74 0.881 47.2% -64 — +332 34.5% -1.10 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 96.4 +0.17 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07
30 2022 1667 108.1 +0.32 -2.42 0.840 46.3% -63 +2 — 36.4% -0.96 4–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.03 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
31 2023 1534 102.7 -1.75 -2.65 0.707 43.4% -15 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17
Career — 1880 132.9 +3.27 -1.72 0.995 49.7% -17 -153 +106 47.8% -0.23 41–37 (53%) 46–37 (55%) 106.9 -0.94 — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.