H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC

Conchita Martínez vs Anna Kournikova H2H: 5-3

Conchita Martínez holds a 5–3 lead over Anna Kournikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Conchita Martínez leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2003 Charleston second round 6-4 1-1 RET.

ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 9, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #25 6-4 1-1 (ret.) Anna Kournikova #67 Match data
Aug 2, 2002* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Anna Kournikova #47 1-6 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #70 Match data
Apr 17, 2002* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #37 7-6(5) 6-1 Anna Kournikova #68 Match data
Nov 18, 2000* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals QF Carpet Anna Kournikova #10 6-4 6-0 Conchita Martínez #5 Match data
Aug 21, 1998* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #7 6-0 6-3 Anna Kournikova #15 Match data
May 16, 1998* Berlin WTA 1000 SF Clay Conchita Martínez #9 6-0 6-1 Anna Kournikova #16 Match data
Mar 23, 1998* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R16 Hard Anna Kournikova #25 6-3 6-0 Conchita Martínez #9 Match data
Mar 9, 1998* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Conchita Martínez #9 6-3 6-4 Anna Kournikova #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33
Anna Kournikova #606 #8 2,158 2,072 184 120 60.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Conchita Martínez Anna Kournikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1995 1–1 50.0% #289 1,513 0 0
15 1996 5–4 55.6% #65 1,599 0 0
16 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1 1997 17–10 63.0% #30 1,838 0 0
17 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4 1998 40–20 66.7% #13 1,971 0 0
18 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7 1999 35–19 64.8% #12 1,933 0 0
19 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10 2000 47–26 64.4% #9 1,940 0 0
20 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11 2001 10–10 50.0% #71 1,816 0 0
21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16 2002 28–25 52.8% #35 1,723 0 0
22 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20 2003 1–5 16.7% #310 1,662 0 0
23 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33