H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Cynthia Doerner vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 2-1

Cynthia Doerner holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cynthia Doerner leads 1–0 on clay, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1980 Chichester round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cynthia Doerner
AUS Age 75 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 70 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 6-2 Cynthia Doerner Match data Jun 12, 1980* R16 Chichester WTA 250 Grass
Cynthia Doerner 1-6 6-0 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Aug 19, 1976* R32 Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay
Cynthia Doerner 6-1 5-7 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jul 12, 1975* SF Atlantic City WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cynthia Doerner — — — 1,874 152 162 48.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Betsy Nagelsen — #25 28 1,892 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cynthia Doerner Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 1968 1–3 25.0% — 1,472 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1969 0–5 0.0% — 1,429 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1970 2–3 40.0% — 1,457 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,707 0 3
20 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,417 0 0 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1972 21–20 51.2% — 1,621 0 1 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,657 0 3
22 1973 7–13 35.0% — 1,611 0 1 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1974 4–5 44.4% — 1,627 0 1 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,755 0 5
24 1975 44–23 65.7% — 1,853 0 4 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,808 0 6
25 1976 18–26 40.9% — 1,709 0 4 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,706 0 6
26 1977 15–19 44.1% — 1,736 0 4 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,693 0 6
27 1978 11–18 37.9% — 1,631 0 4 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,631 0 6
28 1979 14–12 53.8% — 1,651 0 5 1985 14–12 53.8% — 1,714 0 6
29 1980 12–7 63.2% — 1,658 0 5 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,646 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% — 1,608 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% — 1,511 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cynthia Doerner Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1969 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1970 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1975 7 3 10 70.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1980 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 18 31 41.9% 58 53 111 52.3% 56 60 116 48.3% 11 23 34 32.4% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cynthia Doerner Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.54
17 1968 1472 93.7 — — — — — — +10 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.26 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.49
18 1969 1430 97.2 — — — — — — +31 16.7% -3.08 0–2 — — -0.19 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.24
19 1970 1458 107.1 — — — — — — +37 36.4% -1.27 1–0 — — +0.03 1976 1708 124.4 — — — — -64 -115 +73 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.59
20 1971 1417 92.7 — — — — +128 +11 +68 34.6% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.05 1977 1678 124.1 — — — — -30 -106 +48 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
21 1972 1621 121.5 — — — — -109 -85 +2 53.1% -0.02 6–10 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.51 1978 1658 129.7 — — — — -102 -84 +101 41.2% -0.57 4–11 (27%) 3–7 (30%) 91.9 -1.33
22 1973 1611 129.7 — — — — -122 -39 +10 34.1% -0.63 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 99.0 -1.27 1979 1695 123.1 — — — — -131 — +13 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.74
23 1974 1628 124.6 — — — — — — +59 50.0% -0.35 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.10 1980 1756 131.7 — — — — -144 — +38 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -2.08
24 1975 1853 137.9 — — — — -85 -117 -198 61.7% +1.03 13–9 (59%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 +3.93 1981 1809 135.3 — — — — -128 -307 +95 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.62
25 1976 1710 134.6 — — — — -72 +26 -36 43.7% -0.40 8–11 (42%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -2.78 1982 1706 123.4 — — — — -98 -215 +169 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 +0.16
26 1977 1736 128.5 — — — — -163 +27 -47 46.5% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 -1.94 1983 1693 127.0 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.86
27 1978 1631 108.3 — — — — -52 +89 -21 38.3% -1.02 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.02 1984 1632 126.6 — — — — +58 -142 +116 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.78
28 1979 1652 130.8 — — — — — — +44 54.4% +0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.8 +2.55 1985 1714 129.7 — — — — -25 — +88 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.14
29 1980 1658 120.4 — — — — — +16 +55 63.4% +0.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.45 1986 1700 131.2 — — — — -55 — +170 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.52
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1646 121.7 — — — — -24 — +150 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.59
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -26 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1663 126.1 — — — — -56 — +97 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.46
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1640 115.1 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -50 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1874 131.1 — — — — -87 -29 -5 49.3% -0.04 43–53 (45%) 20–28 (42%) 93.4 +0.81 — 1893 132.2 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–129 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.0 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.