Cynthia Doerner
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilana Kloss | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 30, 1979 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 23, 1979 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 10, 1978 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 3, 1977 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 7, 1980 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Elisabeth Ekblom H2H: 0-1
Elisabeth Ekblom holds a 1–0 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elisabeth Ekblom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elisabeth Ekblom won the 1978 Roland Garros round of 64 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth Ekblom | 6-2 7-5 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data | Jun 1, 1978* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,874 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Elisabeth Ekblom | — | — | — | 1,587 | 40 | 63 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Elisabeth Ekblom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Elisabeth Ekblom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1968 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 20 | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1972 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 100.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1973 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1980 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 58 | 53 | 111 | 52.3% | 56 | 60 | 116 | 48.3% | 11 | 23 | 34 | 32.4% | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 12 | 20 | 32 | 37.5% | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Elisabeth Ekblom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1486 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.22 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1472 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | 30.0% | -1.80 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.26 | 1975 | 1478 | 99.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 18 | 1969 | 1430 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | 16.7% | -3.08 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.19 | 1976 | 1531 | 115.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +110 | 46.7% | -0.13 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.39 |
| 19 | 1970 | 1458 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | 36.4% | -1.27 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.03 | 1977 | 1559 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +77 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.58 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +2.87 |
| 20 | 1971 | 1417 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | +128 | +11 | +68 | 34.6% | -1.15 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +1.05 | 1978 | 1536 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +70 | 33.3% | -1.50 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.22 |
| 21 | 1972 | 1621 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -109 | -85 | +2 | 53.1% | -0.02 | 6–10 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.50 | 1979 | 1551 | 117.8 | — | — | — | — | +71 | +26 | — | 53.8% | +0.46 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–1 | — | +2.37 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1611 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -122 | -39 | +10 | 34.1% | -0.63 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.0 | -1.22 | 1980 | 1515 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -4 | +95 | 25.0% | -1.34 | 2–0 | 0–2 | — | +0.55 |
| 23 | 1974 | 1628 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | 50.0% | -0.35 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.10 | 1981 | 1496 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | +108 | 26.3% | -1.21 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | 1975 | 1853 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | -85 | -117 | -198 | 61.7% | +1.03 | 13–9 (59%) | 7–8 (47%) | 102.0 | +4.49 | 1982 | 1527 | 113.4 | — | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | 50.0% | +0.33 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.9 | +1.05 |
| 25 | 1976 | 1712 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +24 | -38 | 43.7% | -0.40 | 8–11 (42%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.1 | -2.75 | 1983 | 1509 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.34 |
| 26 | 1977 | 1736 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -163 | +27 | -47 | 46.5% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.4 | -1.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 1632 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | -49 | +88 | -22 | 38.3% | -1.02 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +1.39 | 1985 | 1513 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 44.4% | -0.44 | 2–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.43 |
| 28 | 1979 | 1652 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +45 | 54.4% | +0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.8 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 1658 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | +55 | 63.4% | +0.88 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.60 | 1987 | 1494 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.29 |
| Career | — | 1874 | 131.0 | — | — | — | — | -87 | -29 | -5 | 49.3% | -0.04 | 43–53 (45%) | 20–28 (42%) | 93.3 | +1.38 | — | 1588 | 116.4 | — | — | — | — | +54 | +1 | +87 | 40.3% | -0.61 | 14–15 (48%) | 6–13 (32%) | 97.6 | +8.03 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Elisabeth Ekblom
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lena Sandin | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 16, 1982 | H2H |
| Iva Budarova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 18, 1979 | H2H |
| Renata Tomanova | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 7, 1980 | H2H |
| Asa Flodin | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jul 23, 1982 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 18, 1981 | H2H |