H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Fiorella Bonicelli H2H: 1-1
Cynthia Doerner and Fiorella Bonicelli are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fiorella Bonicelli won the 1975 Phoenix third round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1975* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fiorella Bonicelli | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Oct 1, 1975* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Cynthia Doerner | 1-0 (ret.) | Fiorella Bonicelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Fiorella Bonicelli | — | — | — | 1,866 | 135 | 97 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Fiorella Bonicelli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 11 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 14–8 | 63.6% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 9–10 | 47.4% | — | 1,763 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 12 |