H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Jeanne Evert H2H: 2-0
Cynthia Doerner holds a 2–0 lead over Jeanne Evert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cynthia Doerner leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Cynthia Doerner won the 1976 Toronto fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1976 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1975* | New York | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Jeanne Evert | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jeanne Evert | — | — | — | 1,929 | 132 | 90 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Jeanne Evert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 16–9 | 64.0% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 19–11 | 63.3% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 6 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 9 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |