H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Lesley Hunt H2H: 1-2
Lesley Hunt holds a 2–1 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Lesley Hunt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesley Hunt won the 1978 Toronto third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1978 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lesley Hunt | 6-2 6-2 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1978* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 7-6 6-0 | Lesley Hunt | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1976 | Toronto | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lesley Hunt | 7-5 5-7 7-6(6) | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Lesley Hunt | — | — | — | 1,933 | 306 | 244 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Lesley Hunt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 45–20 | 69.2% | — | 1,919 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 42–27 | 60.9% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 26–17 | 60.5% | — | 1,915 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 30–30 | 50.0% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 10 |