Cynthia Doerner
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilana Kloss | 4 | 2 | 6 | Aug 30, 1979 | H2H |
| Lesley Charles | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 23, 1979 | H2H |
| Laura Dupont | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jun 10, 1978 | H2H |
| Wendy Turnbull | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 3, 1977 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 7, 1980 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Linda Mottram H2H: 0-1 (incl. walkovers)
Cynthia Doerner vs Linda Mottram: 0–0 excluding walkovers; 0–1 including 1 walkover. Across 1 main-draw results including walkovers, Linda Mottram leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Linda Mottram won the 1977 Chicago round of 32 W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H including walkovers
0
–
1
1 main-draw results
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linda Mottram | (w/o) | Cynthia Doerner | Match data | Feb 10, 1977* | R32 | Chicago | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,874 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Linda Mottram | — | — | — | 1,865 | 95 | 49 | 66.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Linda Mottram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 6–1 | 85.7% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 32–8 | 80.0% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 21–7 | 75.0% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 11 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 11 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Linda Mottram | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 0 | 6 | 100.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1968 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 1969 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1975 | — | — | — | — | 22 | 3 | 25 | 88.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% |
| 20 | 1971 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 21 | 1972 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1973 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 58 | 53 | 111 | 52.3% | 56 | 60 | 116 | 48.3% | 11 | 23 | 34 | 32.4% | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 46 | 13 | 59 | 78.0% | 15 | 18 | 33 | 45.5% | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Linda Mottram | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1490 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1596 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +65 | — | 70.6% | +1.00 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–0 | — | +0.67 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1472 | 93.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +10 | 30.0% | -1.80 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.26 | 1974 | 1613 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +57 | -61 | 50.0% | +0.02 | 3–3 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.1 | +1.51 |
| 18 | 1969 | 1430 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | 16.7% | -3.08 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.19 | 1975 | 1785 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +100 | -101 | 75.3% | +1.73 | 5–2 (71%) | 4–0 (100%) | 106.6 | +4.85 |
| 19 | 1970 | 1458 | 107.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | 36.4% | -1.27 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.03 | 1976 | 1810 | 134.3 | — | — | — | — | -30 | +94 | -120 | 71.0% | +1.73 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | +5.47 |
| 20 | 1971 | 1417 | 92.7 | — | — | — | — | +128 | +11 | +68 | 34.6% | -1.15 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +1.05 | 1977 | 1761 | 136.8 | — | — | — | — | -13 | +103 | — | 44.2% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–1 | — | -1.50 |
| 21 | 1972 | 1621 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -109 | -85 | +2 | 53.1% | -0.02 | 6–10 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.50 | 1978 | 1742 | 120.0 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | -157 | 67.4% | +1.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.7 | +2.04 |
| 22 | 1973 | 1611 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -122 | -39 | +10 | 34.1% | -0.63 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–3 (0%) | 99.0 | -1.22 | 1979 | 1692 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +130 | — | 36.4% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.96 |
| 23 | 1974 | 1628 | 124.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +59 | 50.0% | -0.35 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 1853 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | -85 | -117 | -198 | 61.7% | +1.03 | 13–9 (59%) | 7–8 (47%) | 102.0 | +4.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1976 | 1712 | 134.5 | — | — | — | — | -74 | +24 | -38 | 43.7% | -0.40 | 8–11 (42%) | 2–5 (29%) | 96.1 | -2.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 1736 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | -163 | +27 | -47 | 46.5% | -0.41 | 4–5 (44%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.4 | -1.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 1632 | 108.4 | — | — | — | — | -49 | +88 | -22 | 38.3% | -1.02 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–0 | — | +1.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 1652 | 130.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +45 | 54.4% | +0.75 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.8 | +2.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 1658 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | +55 | 63.4% | +0.88 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–0 | — | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1874 | 131.0 | — | — | — | — | -87 | -29 | -5 | 49.3% | -0.04 | 43–53 (45%) | 20–28 (42%) | 93.3 | +1.38 | — | 1866 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -22 | +96 | -102 | 62.7% | +0.92 | 21–13 (62%) | 16–6 (73%) | 111.0 | +9.83 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Linda Mottram
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Thompson | 5 | 1 | 6 | May 14, 1978 | H2H |
| Michelle Tyler | 4 | 1 | 5 | May 2, 1976 | H2H |
| Annette Coe | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 16, 1977 | H2H |
| Chris Oneil | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 10, 1975 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 22, 1979 | H2H |