H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Lindsey Beaven H2H: 1-0
Cynthia Doerner holds a 1–0 lead over Lindsey Beaven in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cynthia Doerner leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cynthia Doerner won the 1972 Newport Wales third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 76
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1972* | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Cynthia Doerner | 6-1 6-4 | Lindsey Beaven | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Lindsey Beaven | — | — | — | 1,738 | 121 | 133 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Lindsey Beaven | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 17–13 | 56.7% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 26–23 | 53.1% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |