H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 1-3
Michelle Tyler holds a 3–1 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Michelle Tyler leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1978 Sydney second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 1978* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Michelle Tyler | 6-4 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Michelle Tyler | 0-6 9-7 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| May 2, 1975* | Sutton | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Michelle Tyler | 2-6 7-6 7-5 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1975* | Madrid Auto Club | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 7-6 6-3 | Michelle Tyler | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Michelle Tyler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |