H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Cynthia Doerner vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 1-3

Mima Jausovec holds a 3–1 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cynthia Doerner won the 1977 Canadian Open round of 16 6-4 1-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cynthia Doerner
AUS Age 75 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cynthia Doerner 6-4 1-6 6-2 Mima Jausovec Match data Aug 19, 1977* R16 Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay
Mima Jausovec 1-6 6-4 6-2 Cynthia Doerner Match data Jan 13, 1977* R32 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-1 Cynthia Doerner Match data Sep 3, 1976* R128 US Open Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-3 Cynthia Doerner Match data Mar 25, 1976* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cynthia Doerner — — — 1,874 152 162 48.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cynthia Doerner Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1968 1–3 25.0% — 1,472 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1969 0–5 0.0% — 1,429 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1970 2–3 40.0% — 1,457 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
20 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,417 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1972 21–20 51.2% — 1,621 0 1 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1973 7–13 35.0% — 1,611 0 1 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
23 1974 4–5 44.4% — 1,627 0 1 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
24 1975 44–23 65.7% — 1,853 0 4 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
25 1976 18–26 40.9% — 1,712 0 4 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
26 1977 15–19 44.1% — 1,736 0 4 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1978 11–18 37.9% — 1,631 0 4 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1979 14–12 53.8% — 1,651 0 5 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1980 12–7 63.2% — 1,657 0 5 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cynthia Doerner Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1969 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1970 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1975 7 3 10 70.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1980 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 18 31 41.9% 58 53 111 52.3% 56 60 116 48.3% 11 23 34 32.4% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cynthia Doerner Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
17 1968 1472 93.7 — — — — — — +10 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.26 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1969 1430 97.2 — — — — — — +31 16.7% -3.08 0–2 — — -0.19 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1970 1458 107.1 — — — — — — +37 36.4% -1.27 1–0 — — +0.03 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1971 1417 92.7 — — — — +128 +11 +68 34.6% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.05 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1972 1621 121.5 — — — — -109 -85 +2 53.1% -0.02 6–10 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1973 1611 129.7 — — — — -122 -39 +10 34.1% -0.63 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 99.0 -1.22 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1974 1628 124.6 — — — — — — +59 50.0% -0.35 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.10 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1975 1853 137.8 — — — — -85 -117 -198 61.7% +1.03 13–9 (59%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 +4.49 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1976 1712 134.5 — — — — -74 +24 -38 43.7% -0.40 8–11 (42%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -2.75 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1977 1736 128.5 — — — — -163 +27 -47 46.5% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 -1.36 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 1978 1632 108.4 — — — — -49 +88 -22 38.3% -1.02 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.39 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 1979 1652 130.7 — — — — — — +45 54.4% +0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.8 +2.54 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 1980 1658 120.3 — — — — — +15 +55 63.4% +0.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.60 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1874 131.0 — — — — -87 -29 -5 49.3% -0.04 43–53 (45%) 20–28 (42%) 93.3 +1.38 — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.