H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Mona Guerrant H2H: 1-2
Mona Guerrant holds a 2–1 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mona Guerrant leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Guerrant won the 1976 Sarasota fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1976* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mona Guerrant | 6-1 6-1 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1973* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mona Guerrant | 7-5 6-4 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1972* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Cynthia Doerner | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Mona Guerrant | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mona Guerrant | — | — | — | 1,939 | 123 | 117 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Mona Guerrant | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 17–19 | 47.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,886 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |