H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Cynthia Doerner vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 0-2 (incl. walkovers)

Cynthia Doerner vs Pam Teeguarden: 0–1 excluding walkovers; 0–2 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1976 San Francisco round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cynthia Doerner
AUS Age 75 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H including walkovers
0 – 2
2 main-draw results
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 6-1 6-4 Cynthia Doerner Match data Mar 4, 1976* R32 San Francisco WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Teeguarden (w/o) Cynthia Doerner Match data Mar 18, 1973* R16 Richmond WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cynthia Doerner — — — 1,874 152 162 48.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cynthia Doerner Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 1–3 25.0% — 1,472 0 0 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
18 1969 0–5 0.0% — 1,429 0 0 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
19 1970 2–3 40.0% — 1,457 0 0 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
20 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,417 0 0 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
21 1972 21–20 51.2% — 1,621 0 1 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
22 1973 7–13 35.0% — 1,611 0 1 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
23 1974 4–5 44.4% — 1,627 0 1 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
24 1975 44–23 65.7% — 1,853 0 4 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
25 1976 18–26 40.9% — 1,712 0 4 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
26 1977 15–19 44.1% — 1,736 0 4 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
27 1978 11–18 37.9% — 1,631 0 4 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
28 1979 14–12 53.8% — 1,651 0 5 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
29 1980 12–7 63.2% — 1,657 0 5 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cynthia Doerner Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
18 1969 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
19 1970 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1975 7 3 10 70.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
25 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
26 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
28 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
29 1980 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 13 18 31 41.9% 58 53 111 52.3% 56 60 116 48.3% 11 23 34 32.4% — 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cynthia Doerner Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1472 93.7 — — — — — — +10 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.26 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
18 1969 1430 97.2 — — — — — — +31 16.7% -3.08 0–2 — — -0.19 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
19 1970 1458 107.1 — — — — — — +37 36.4% -1.27 1–0 — — +0.03 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
20 1971 1417 92.7 — — — — +128 +11 +68 34.6% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.05 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
21 1972 1621 121.5 — — — — -109 -85 +2 53.1% -0.02 6–10 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
22 1973 1611 129.7 — — — — -122 -39 +10 34.1% -0.63 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 99.0 -1.22 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
23 1974 1628 124.6 — — — — — — +59 50.0% -0.35 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.10 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
24 1975 1853 137.8 — — — — -85 -117 -198 61.7% +1.03 13–9 (59%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 +4.49 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
25 1976 1712 134.5 — — — — -74 +24 -38 43.7% -0.40 8–11 (42%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -2.75 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
26 1977 1736 128.5 — — — — -163 +27 -47 46.5% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 -1.36 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
27 1978 1632 108.4 — — — — -49 +88 -22 38.3% -1.02 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.39 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
28 1979 1652 130.7 — — — — — — +45 54.4% +0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.8 +2.54 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
29 1980 1658 120.3 — — — — — +15 +55 63.4% +0.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.60 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career — 1874 131.0 — — — — -87 -29 -5 49.3% -0.04 43–53 (45%) 20–28 (42%) 93.3 +1.38 — 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.