H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Veronica Burton H2H: 2-0
Cynthia Doerner holds a 2–0 lead over Veronica Burton in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cynthia Doerner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cynthia Doerner won the 1976 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Cynthia Doerner | 6-2 6-1 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
| May 27, 1972* | Chingford | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Cynthia Doerner | 6-4 6-0 | Veronica Burton | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Veronica Burton | — | — | — | 1,832 | 139 | 131 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Veronica Burton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 39–20 | 66.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1976 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 12–6 | 66.7% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |