H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Cynthia Doerner vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 0-3

Virginia Ruzici holds a 3–0 lead over Cynthia Doerner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Virginia Ruzici leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Virginia Ruzici won the 1979 Melbourne round of 32 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cynthia Doerner
AUS Age 75 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruzici 7-6 6-1 Cynthia Doerner Match data Nov 29, 1979* R32 Melbourne WTA 250 Grass
Virginia Ruzici 6-1 6-1 Cynthia Doerner Match data Jun 21, 1978* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Virginia Ruzici 6-1 6-4 Cynthia Doerner Match data Feb 26, 1977* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cynthia Doerner — — — 1,874 152 162 48.4% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,123 455 274 62.4% 1 0 0 1 17 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cynthia Doerner Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 1–3 25.0% — 1,472 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1969 0–5 0.0% — 1,429 0 0 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,493 0 0
19 1970 2–3 40.0% — 1,457 0 0 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,647 0 2
20 1971 3–8 27.3% — 1,417 0 0 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,686 0 3
21 1972 21–20 51.2% — 1,621 0 1 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,797 0 3
22 1973 7–13 35.0% — 1,611 0 1 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,919 0 4
23 1974 4–5 44.4% — 1,627 0 1 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,092 1 8
24 1975 44–23 65.7% — 1,853 0 4 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,974 1 8
25 1976 18–26 40.9% — 1,712 0 4 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,031 1 12
26 1977 15–19 44.1% — 1,736 0 4 1981 58–30 65.9% — 1,919 1 13
27 1978 11–18 37.9% — 1,631 0 4 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,983 1 17
28 1979 14–12 53.8% — 1,651 0 5 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 18
29 1980 12–7 63.2% — 1,657 0 5 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 18
30 — — — — — — — 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 19
31 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 19
32 — — — — — — — 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,657 1 19

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cynthia Doerner Virginia Ruzici
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1973 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
19 1970 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
20 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 28 12 40 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5%
23 1974 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1978 14 9 23 60.9% 19 4 23 82.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 11 27 59.3%
24 1975 7 3 10 70.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1979 10 6 16 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 15 9 24 62.5%
25 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 1980 14 5 19 73.7% 27 5 32 84.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 24 11 35 68.6%
26 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 27 8 35 77.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 16 13 29 55.2%
27 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1982 10 5 15 66.7% 24 5 29 82.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
29 1980 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1984 2 6 8 25.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 6 13 53.8% 17 6 23 73.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 13 18 31 41.9% 58 53 111 52.3% 56 60 116 48.3% 11 23 34 32.4% — 69 55 124 55.6% 218 85 303 71.9% 43 34 77 55.8% 114 96 210 54.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cynthia Doerner Virginia Ruzici
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1472 93.7 — — — — — — +10 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.26 1972 1484 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.15
18 1969 1430 97.2 — — — — — — +31 16.7% -3.08 0–2 — — -0.19 1973 1494 102.8 — — — — +96 -24 — 33.3% -1.19 0–1 0–1 — +0.98
19 1970 1458 107.1 — — — — — — +37 36.4% -1.27 1–0 — — +0.03 1974 1647 134.9 — — — — -93 +57 -167 56.8% +0.64 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 +1.04
20 1971 1417 92.7 — — — — +128 +11 +68 34.6% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +1.05 1975 1686 122.9 — — — — — +81 — 51.6% -0.10 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.38
21 1972 1621 121.5 — — — — -109 -85 +2 53.1% -0.02 6–10 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.50 1976 1797 142.1 — — — — -255 +110 -321 58.1% +0.62 9–8 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 100.1 -1.76
22 1973 1611 129.7 — — — — -122 -39 +10 34.1% -0.63 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 99.0 -1.22 1977 1920 148.2 — — — — -145 +43 — 50.0% +0.01 11–3 (79%) 1–0 — -5.12
23 1974 1628 124.6 — — — — — — +59 50.0% -0.35 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.10 1978 2092 158.8 — — — — -38 -54 -463 66.3% +1.06 14–6 (70%) 14–6 (70%) 111.1 -7.09
24 1975 1853 137.8 — — — — -85 -117 -198 61.7% +1.03 13–9 (59%) 7–8 (47%) 102.0 +4.49 1979 1975 151.3 — — — — +50 +39 -193 63.7% +0.92 15–10 (60%) 6–5 (55%) 103.9 -3.12
25 1976 1712 134.5 — — — — -74 +24 -38 43.7% -0.40 8–11 (42%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 -2.75 1980 2032 157.7 — — — — +31 +158 -224 69.9% +1.37 14–9 (61%) 10–7 (59%) 101.1 -5.80
26 1977 1736 128.5 — — — — -163 +27 -47 46.5% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 98.4 -1.36 1981 1919 158.9 — — — — -19 +290 -67 62.6% +0.85 13–7 (65%) 9–6 (60%) 102.2 -6.70
27 1978 1632 108.4 — — — — -49 +88 -22 38.3% -1.02 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +1.39 1982 1984 156.4 — — — — -61 +260 -118 68.6% +1.30 9–11 (45%) 11–6 (65%) 98.3 -4.11
28 1979 1652 130.7 — — — — — — +45 54.4% +0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.8 +2.54 1983 1905 143.8 — — — — +21 +136 -21 60.4% +0.91 6–4 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +2.73
29 1980 1658 120.3 — — — — — +15 +55 63.4% +0.88 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.60 1984 1781 144.3 — — — — -45 +178 — 51.0% +0.29 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 87.0 -0.89
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1786 140.6 — — — — -87 +216 +68 57.4% +0.63 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 102.6 -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1735 90.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.44
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1658 111.9 — — — — — +211 — 46.4% -0.14 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.99
Career — 1874 131.0 — — — — -87 -29 -5 49.3% -0.04 43–53 (45%) 20–28 (42%) 93.3 +1.38 — 2123 154.7 — — — — -27 +141 -197 61.0% +0.79 108–81 (57%) 70–52 (57%) 104.0 -3.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.