H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cynthia Doerner vs Wendy Overton H2H: 2-2
Cynthia Doerner and Wendy Overton are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Cynthia Doerner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1978 Montreal third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1978* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Wendy Overton | 6-3 6-1 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1976* | Akron | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cynthia Doerner | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1976* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Cynthia Doerner | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1975* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Wendy Overton | 6-1 6-1 | Cynthia Doerner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cynthia Doerner | — | — | — | 1,893 | 152 | 162 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cynthia Doerner | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1970 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1971 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1972 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 44–23 | 65.7% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 18–26 | 40.9% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1980 | 12–7 | 63.2% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |