H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Daja Bedanova vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-0

Daja Bedanova holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daja Bedanova won the 2003 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daja Bedanova
CZE Age 43 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daja Bedanova #41 6-3 5-7 6-4 Iveta Benesova #72 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daja Bedanova #998 #16 1,323 1,806 65 72 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,762 178 223 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daja Bedanova Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 1–1 50.0% #295 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 13–9 59.1% #53 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2001 20–20 50.0% #28 1,772 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 24–25 49.0% #37 1,718 0 1 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,564 0 0
20 2003 6–15 28.6% #155 1,597 0 1 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 25–20 55.6% #36 1,646 0 1
22 2005 1–2 33.3% #295 1,600 0 1 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,610 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,592 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,521 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2008 21–18 53.8% #43 1,652 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,647 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,637 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,626 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,579 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,519 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daja Bedanova Iveta Benesova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 16 13 29 55.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2002 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 4 5 9 44.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 11 13 24 45.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 15 28 46.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 41 86 52.3% 7 12 19 36.8% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 10 15 33.3% — 103 116 219 47.0% 65 79 144 45.1% 5 18 23 21.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daja Bedanova Iveta Benesova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1522 117.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1698 131.5 — — — — +23 — — 51.9% +0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 110.6 +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1772 151.8 — — — — +15 -200 -253 50.5% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 3–11 (21%) 96.7 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1718 137.2 — — — — -23 -139 -7 49.1% -0.08 10–10 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 98.1 -0.10 2002 1564 116.6 — — — — +44 -100 — 47.4% -0.47 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -0.65
20 2003 1597 114.3 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +21 -39 +82 33.3% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.74 2003 1479 107.1 — — — — +105 -55 — 38.2% -0.94 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.1 +0.69
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1647 128.5 — — — — -23 +14 — 53.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 +0.27
22 2005 1600 108.4 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.50 1–1 1–0 — -0.49 2005 1610 122.9 — — — — -28 +68 — 43.2% -0.50 13–9 (59%) 2–7 (22%) 99.0 -0.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1592 112.3 — — — — +38 +5 -151 40.9% -0.93 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 -0.26
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1521 104.5 — — — — +85 -42 — 34.1% -1.25 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -0.37
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1652 126.5 — — — — -4 -18 — 50.5% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 -0.69
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1647 132.9 — — — — +22 +22 -131 50.9% +0.18 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 109.1 +1.09
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1637 121.1 — — — — +2 +1 — 44.7% -0.61 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1627 135.9 — — — — +26 -37 — 40.2% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 -2.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1579 127.8 — — — — +90 -3 -125 33.9% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -1.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1520 96.7 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +94 — — 0.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.26
Career — 1807 141.8 -0.44 -1.19 0.806 45.7% +4 -107 -36 47.3% -0.15 30–25 (55%) 12–20 (38%) 100.2 -2.60 — 1763 127.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +22 -6 -135 44.0% -0.47 71–55 (56%) 35–44 (44%) 101.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.