H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Dally Randriantefy vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 0-2
Kveta Peschke holds a 2–0 lead over Dally Randriantefy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAD
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kveta Peschke | 7-5 6-1 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kveta Peschke | 6-1 6-0 | Dally Randriantefy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dally Randriantefy | #99 | #44 | 721 | 1,690 | 43 | 66 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dally Randriantefy | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #114 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #205 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #164 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #102 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #68 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |