H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Dana Gilbert vs Kate Brasher H2H: 0-1

Kate Brasher holds a 1–0 lead over Dana Gilbert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Brasher leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1980 Wimbledon round of 128 3-6 6-3 8-6.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Brasher 3-6 6-3 8-6 Dana Gilbert Match data Jun 25, 1980* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dana Gilbert 1,711 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Brasher 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,465 0 0
15 1978 7–7 50.0% 1,493 0 0
16 1979 0–4 0.0% 1,440 0 0
17 1977 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 0 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,481 0 0
18 1978 8–5 61.5% 1,615 0 1 1981 29–16 64.4% 1,622 0 2
19 1979 3–13 18.8% 1,555 0 1 1982 25–11 69.4% 1,638 0 4
20 1980 14–12 53.8% 1,664 0 2 1983 3–5 37.5% 1,612 0 6
21 1981 6–12 33.3% 1,612 0 2 1984 1–2 33.3% 1,584 0 6
22 1982 20–15 57.1% 1,663 0 2 1985 0–3 0.0% 1,530 0 6
23 1983 9–21 30.0% 1,539 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Brasher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
14 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1979 0 3 3 0.0%
17 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7%
Career 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 17 18 35 48.6% 5 17 22 22.7% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1976 1481 96.5 0.0% -3.00 +0.46
14 1977 1466 99.5 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 +0.25
15 1978 1493 109.5 +17 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.65
16 1979 1440 92.3 +18 0.0% -3.17 +0.70
17 1977 1509 98.0 40.0% -1.00 1–0 +0.42 1980 1481 106.8 -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) +0.76
18 1978 1616 120.2 -30 +61 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.71 1981 1622 128.1 -127 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.48
19 1979 1556 109.9 -25 +140 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +0.65 1982 1638 118.0 -125 -5 -130 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.77
20 1980 1665 123.9 -113 +95 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +1.01 1983 1612 104.4 -134 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.33
21 1981 1612 104.5 -26 +81 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 +0.39 1984 1585 95.2 28.6% -1.43 1–0 +0.64
22 1982 1664 118.1 -84 +47 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.19 1985 1531 92.9 0.0% -2.67 +0.31
23 1983 1540 100.8 +29 +72 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) +1.52
Career 1712 115.9 -43 +71 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.92 1735 116.9 -125 -4 -78 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.