H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Dana Gilbert vs Kate Glancy H2H: 1-0

Dana Gilbert holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dana Gilbert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dana Gilbert won the 1980 Phoenix round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dana Gilbert
USA Age 66
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dana Gilbert 6-3 6-1 Kate Glancy Match data Oct 8, 1980* R64 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dana Gilbert — — — 1,711 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1978 8–5 61.5% — 1,615 0 1 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,555 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1980 14–12 53.8% — 1,664 0 2 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,612 0 2 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 1982 20–15 57.1% — 1,663 0 2 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0
23 1983 9–21 30.0% — 1,539 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dana Gilbert Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 1977 1509 98.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.42 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 1978 1616 120.2 — — — — -30 +61 — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.71 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
19 1979 1556 109.9 — — — — -25 +140 — 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1665 123.9 — — — — -113 +95 — 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +1.01 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 1981 1612 104.5 — — — — -26 +81 — 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +0.39 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 1982 1664 118.1 — — — — -84 +47 — 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.19 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
23 1983 1540 100.8 — — — — +29 +72 — 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1712 115.9 — — — — -43 +71 — 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.92 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.